The
presidential race entered its final month with the first of the three
presidential debates having taken place in the University of Denver, Denver,
Colorado, on October 3. The importance of the debates cannot be underestimated
as, with the presidential elections approaching, any vote counts and the whole
country closely follows every word the candidates have to say about the issues
that people are concerned about.
The
first presidential debate focused on the domestic policy, including such issues
as social security, healthcare programs and the role of the government, but
somehow managed to avoid the immigration topic. Although most voters believe
that the immigration is an important issue, being a significant part of the
economy and one of the major issues in the GOP platform, as well as the
Democratic National Convention, it was not important for the presidential
candidates in their discussion on October 3.
Some
people felt that the immigration issue had to be touched upon, at least, in
some way in the first presidential debate on domestic policy as it represented
a major part of domestic policy and economy.
According
to Fox News Latino, Luis Gutierrez, the Illinois Democrat who is chair of the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus Task Force on Immigration, made the following
comment on this situation: “It is absurd that a 90 minute debate on domestic
policy and the economy would not address immigration at all, not even in
passing, especially when Latino voters are considered the key demographic that
will determine who sits in the White House.”
However,
many believe that the immigration topic is still likely to come up in some way
later in one of the other two debates scheduled this month. With the
presidential race getting tight, both candidates understand the important of
reaching out to the Hispanic population and earning their support. A recent
analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center reports that a record 24 million Latinos
are eligible to vote in the 2012 election. That is an increase by more than 4
million or 22 percent since 2008. Neither candidate can afford to neglect this
community.
Consequently,
last Monday, 2 days before the Denver meeting, in the effort to outreach the
Hispanic voters, Mitt Romney stepped back to support the Obama immigration
initiative. “On Monday, after months of pressure to clarify whether he would
end the program if elected, Romney said in an interview with The Denver Post
that he would not cancel two-year deportation deferrals already granted by the
Obama administration,” the New York Times said.
However,
just hours before the Wednesday debate, campaign representative clarified that,
if elected, Mr. Romney would honor the visas already issued but would not issue
any new deferrals. Romney intended to cancel Obama’s temporary measure and work
on the permanent solution of this problem.
In
his battle to appeal to the Hispanic community Romney emphasizes the economic
issues as being top priority. The Dallas Morning News quoted Ben Ginsberg,
chief counsel to the Romney campaign, as saying: “Hispanic voters are no different
than other voters in that what they will look for is who can provide more jobs
for middle-class Americans, and for communities. It’s all about jobs and the
economy.” In overall, the republican candidate’s position regarding illegal
immigrants remains conservative.
However,
as Washington Post reports, despite Romney’s efforts to hold Obama below 65
percent of the Hispanic vote, the most polls show that the president is above
that level. The Obama’s position on immigration policy doesn’t seem to have changed
much.
Although
both candidates seemed unwilling to discuss the immigration topic, most
observers and reporters put the blame on the moderator, Jim Lehrer, who decided
on the topics to be addressed and follow-up questions, and omitted the
immigration policy. Moderator’s choice to omit the immigration issue could
somewhat be explained by the fact that the immigration is not in the voter
interest as much as it was before the recession. According to the Pew Research
Center, among registered voters, 41% consider immigration a “very important”
determinant of their vote, the lowest of twelve issues being tested, which is
11.0 percent down compared to 2008.
Published
by Aiya Anvarova
Thanks Aiya for addressing this to our blog readers. I was wondering too why none of the candidates had mentioned anything about immegration on the debate. Is the reason can only be that they were not asked? If they wanted to bring it up, they could mention it with any other issues. But they did not. On last election (2008) Obama promissed Hispanic voters of a better solution which lead him to victory. But he was failed to fullfil his promiss. Romney is against of Dream act. He is talking about a long term solution to reform Immegration situatin, but never said what it would be. I think they don’t know what to talk about this. For a large group of voters it is a deciding vote. Hopefully we will see this issue to be discussed on the next debate.
ReplyDeleteI found this fairly interesting. To be honest when I was watching the first Presidential it didn’t even catch my attention that there was no mentioning of the Dream Act or any immigration reform. I personally am all for the Dream Act and think it is important that it gets passed. This nation was built on immigrants and anyone who thinks this land shouldn’t allow people from other countries or don’t belong here are extremely closed minded individuals. The reason several people come to the United States is to seek better and more opportunities. Educational opportunities, being one of the opportunities immigrants seek when they come here at very young age work hard to reach their dream of becoming a doctor, lawyer, nurse, therapist a professional at something. It isn’t fair that too many people don’t believe they deserve the chance to thrive in this country just because they are not “native” to the country.
ReplyDeleteIn a video that was posted on this blog in the video bar titled Obama interrupted at “Dream Act Speech” I heard Obama say that “it is the right thing to do for the American people… because these young people are going to make extraordinary contributions and are already making contributions to our society.” I agree with Obama because there are in fact people in this country who have a degree but cannot work in their professional field just because they do not have documents/citizenship. Now I don’t think that is fair because instead of helping those people help the nation, some people prefer that they do not even reside here. If immigrants get citizenship they could pay taxes which will help the nation grow financially. But going back to this post, I hope that in the next debate there is more discussion on the Dream Act and Immigration Reform.
I agree with Cynthia that the United States is the country of the immigrants and people should be allowed to come to this country and make it their home. However, the question is what to do with the illegal immigration that gets totally out of control. This is what many US residents are concerned about. The illegal immigration on top of the economic problems and unemployment makes people change their mind on the issue and be more critical of it.
DeleteAs far as the post is concerned, some observers are concerned that the immigration issue may not actually come up in further presidential debates and that the debate on domestic policy was the one to touch on this topic. The problem with the Dream Act, in my opinion, is that it is just a temporary measure and has to deal with a small number of immigrants. However, this Act is definitely better than nothing and I support Obama in his effort to help young immigrants to get education and have a chance to become well-deserved members of the society.
I believe the candidates are not that confortable to discuss the Immigration Reform because it is a complex problem and none of them is ready to come up with a comprehensive plan on how to deal with it. I definitely am hoping that the Immigration Reform will get some attention in the next presidential debate.